Search results for " Analysis Of Collective Decision-making"

showing 9 items of 9 documents

Decentralization and growth: what if the cross-jurisdiction approach had met a dead end?

2013

International audience; The relationship between decentralization and economic growth is generally studied from a perspective stressing universal or quasi-universal regularities across jurisdictions. That approach has generated many insights but seems to reach its limits. The paper explains why it allows contrasting positions with regard to the benefits of decentralization even among proponents of free and competitive markets. And it seems from the empirical literature that no robust and economically significant cross-jurisdiction relation between decentralization and economic performance or growth, except perhaps their independence, has been found. The absence of a relation valid across ju…

Economics and EconometricsJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting BehaviorJEL : O - Economic Development Innovation Technological Change and Growth/O.O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity/O.O4.O40 - GeneralSociology and Political Science"yardstick competition"media_common.quotation_subjectDisequilibriumGrowthPublic choiceDecentralizationEmpirical researchDevelopment economicsmedicineEconomics[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances"decentralization"Cross-jurisdictionConstitutional lawpublic choiceRelation (history of concept)[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceJEL : H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H70 - GeneralComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSmedia_commonJurisdictionPublic economics"public choice"DecentralizationJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H70 - General[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Financeeconomic growthIndependencereformsPhilosophyyardstick competition"economic growth""reforms"JEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behaviormedicine.symptomLawJEL: O - Economic Development Innovation Technological Change and Growth/O.O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity/O.O4.O40 - General
researchProduct

The assignment of powers in an open-ended European Union

2003

Presented at CESIFO Conference “A Constitution for the EU”, February 2003; International audience; A major characteristic of the European Union is its transitional or evolving nature, in particular with regard to the assignment of powers between the two main levels of government. More precisely, under current constitutional arrangements, this evolving nature takes the form of an integration process which tends to be monotonous, that is, which can only with great difficulty be reversed. The paper is mainly devoted to the explanation of how this comes about and what effects this has on other features of the process. As a concluding remark, however, it suggests that an additional criterion for…

JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting BehaviorJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • SecessionEuropean uniontransitiongradualism[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceconstitutionConstitutionJEL: F - International Economics/F.F0 - General/F.F0.F02 - International Economic Order and IntegrationEuropean integration European union constitution gradualism transitionEuropean Integrationddc:330[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesEuropean UnionEuropean integration[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGradualism
researchProduct

Horizontal competition in multilevel governmental settings

2013

28 pages; Governments situated on the same level of a multi-level governmental system compete with each other as well as with governments placed higher or lower. This paper is concerned with horizontal competition only. It discusses both competition based on the mobility of agents and competition based on comparisons of performance across jurisdictions - i.e., yardstick competition. With regard to the first kind, the focus is on the capacity of governments and voters to decide policies in spite of the mobility of agents. Some attention is also given to non-standard mechanisms in which mobility is manipulated so as to change the structure of the electorate. The paper considers two forms of h…

JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting BehaviordecentralizationContext (language use)DecentralizationJEL : H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • SecessionCompetition (economics)YardstickPolitical science[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSJEL : H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H70 - GeneralGovernmentHierarchyCompetitionPublic economicsJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • SecessionJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H70 - General[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Financeyardstick competitionMultilevel governmental settingsSpiteJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behaviordecentralizationintergovernmental competitionyardstick competitionPublic financeintergovernmental competition
researchProduct

How significant is yardstick competition among governments? Three reasons to dig deeper

2013

22 pages; The significance of yardstick competition among governments is now confirmed with regard to fiscal variables. This is an important result but the significance of the mechanism must also be sought in a context broader than that of fiscal federalism and without limitation to relations and processes fully observable. Three points are made. Even in the case of governments trying to mimic each other over a single variable, additional variables are involved in an important way. Yardstick competition can be latent without being ineffective. Its major effect, then, is to set bounds to the choices that office-holders could think of making. Finally, the mechanism is a hidden albeit essentia…

JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting BehaviordecentralizationContext (language use)Public choiceDecentralizationCompetition (economics)JEL : H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • SecessionGovernmentsYardstickJEL : H - Public Economics/H.H1 - Structure and Scope of Government/H.H1.H11 - Structure Scope and Performance of Governmentfederalism0502 economics and business050602 political science & public administrationEconomics[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances050207 economicspolitical yardstick competition[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceJEL : H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H70 - GeneralComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSPublic economicsJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H77 - Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • Secession05 social sciencesJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H7 - State and Local Government • Intergovernmental Relations/H.H7.H70 - General16. Peace & justice[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Financepolitical yardstick competitionfederalismdecentralizationsystemsJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H1 - Structure and Scope of Government/H.H1.H11 - Structure Scope and Performance of Government0506 political scienceYardstick competitionsystemsFiscal federalismFederalismJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting BehaviorEconomics and Finance Politics and Public PolicyPublic finance
researchProduct

Labor Market Flexibility and Unemployment: New Empirical Evidence of Static and Dynamic Effects

2012

The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between labor market flexibility and unemployment outcomes. Using a panel of 97 countries from 1985 to 2008, the results of the paper suggest that improvements in labor market flexibility have a statistically and significant negative impact on unemployment outcomes (over unemployment, youth unemployment, and long-term unemployment). Among the different labor market flexibility indicators analyzed, hiring and firing regulations and hiring costs are found to have the strongest effect.

Western hemisphereEconomics and EconometricsLabour economicsYouth unemploymentmedia_common.quotation_subjectlabor market unemploymentInstitutional economicsPlanned economyFlexibility (personality)State ownershipUnemploymentEconomicsGeneral Earth and Planetary SciencesProduction (economics)Emerging marketsEmpirical evidenceConsumption Saving Production Employment and Investment: Other Mobility Unemployment and Vacancies: General Analysis Of Collective Decision-making [Financial crises;Cross country analysis;Labor markets;OECD;Unemployment;Labor market flexibility reforms labor market flexibility labor market institutions unemployment outcomes Macroeconomics]General Environmental ScienceCross country analysismedia_commonComparative Economic Studies
researchProduct

Constitutional Implications of electoral assumptions

2001

International audience

constitutionsJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financeselectionsprobabilistic votingJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSproportional representationmajority
researchProduct

The three wives problem and Shapley value

2015

We examine the Talmudic three wives problem, which is a generalization of the Talmudic contested garment problem solved by Aumann and Maschler (1985) using coalitional procedure. This problem has many practical applications. In an attempt to unify all Talmudic methods, Guiasu (2010, 2011) asserts that it can be explained in terms of “run-to-the-bank”, that is, of Shapley value in a “cumulative game”. It can be challenged because the coalitional procedure yields the same result as the nucleolus, which corresponds to a “dual game”. As Guiasu's solution is paradoxical (it has all the appearances of truth), my contribution consists in explaining the concepts, particularly truncation, that play …

game theoryEconomics and EconometricsSociology and Political SciencePhilosophyJEL : B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B4 - Economic MethodologyJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D71 - Social Choice • Clubs • Committees • Associations[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceShapley valueJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL: B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925PhilosophyThree WivesJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesShapley valueJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D71 - Social Choice • Clubs • Committees • AssociationsJEL: B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B4 - Economic MethodologyTalmudic division[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceHumanitiesJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL : B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925Social Sciences (miscellaneous)Contested GarmentJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
researchProduct

Is Democracy Exportable?

2017

Among many aspects to the question of whether democracy is exportable, this contribution focuses on the role of the people, understood not as a unitary actor but as a heterogeneous set: the citizens. The people matter, in a different way, both in the countries to which democracy might be exported and in the democratic countries in which the question is about promoting democracy elsewhere. The mechanisms or characteristics involved in the discussion include yardstick competition, differences among citizens in the intensity of their preferences, differences among autocracies regarding intrusion into private life, citizens’ assessments of future regime change, and responsiveness of elected inc…

preference intensityhuman rights abusesmedia_common.quotation_subjectAutocracyPublic administrationCompetition (economics)YardstickPolitical scienceyardstick competition over regimes[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesDemocratization[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Financemedia_commonsupport to autocraciesHuman rightspopulardemocratization[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceDemocracyJEL: F - International Economics/F.F5 - International Relations National Security and International Political EconomyRegime changeJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-MakingPolitical economydemocracy promotionJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-MakingJEL : F - International Economics/F.F5 - International Relations National Security and International Political EconomyDemocracy promotion
researchProduct

Don't tell us: the demand for secretive bahaviour

2009

International audience

transparencyJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting BehaviorSecretsJEL : A - General Economics and Teaching/A.A1 - General Economics/A.A1.A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Financeasymmetric informationvotingJEL: A - General Economics and Teaching/A.A1 - General Economics/A.A1.A13 - Relation of Economics to Social ValuesJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D8 - Information Knowledge and Uncertainty/D.D8.D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behaviorvoluntary ignorance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D8 - Information Knowledge and Uncertainty/D.D8.D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism DesignComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
researchProduct